After reading the article, “History of Food Advice”, written by Dupuis,
I found an interesting thing. Nowadays, popular food writers write many
confusing food advices. Nevertheless, there are a huge number of people obey
the food advices without thinking, and they just let the popular food writers
changing their diet habits. They even do not have think about the food advices
are reliable or scientific, and blindly follow the popular food writers.
Obviously, in this article, Dupuis is opposed to follow the popular food
writers. He gave an example that in the past time, we were always pursuing
eating perfectly, and we failed every time. People always liked to follow the
food advices, and the advices did not help, because the advices did not improve
our diets.
In the opposite side, Pollan gave some eating advices in his article, “Unhappy
Meals.” However, at the beginning of the article, he mentions some food
advices, which were unreliable and confusing. He points out that nutritionism
is not science. Instead, it is ideology. After talking about some confusing
food advices, he gave us some his points of view of eating. He suggests that
industrial foods and processed foods are not natural and, of course, not to
eat. Instead, we should have natural food, which is higher quality than
industrial foods or processed foods.
All in all, I agree with Dupuis’s point, and I always choose do not
listen to what the popular food writers said. Instead, I would eat in Chinese
tradition. One of the traditions is that having more vegetable than meat is healthier.
I think Pollan would also agree with your conclusion. One of his suggestions is that you try to follow a traditional food practice, because there is a lot of knowledge and success in traditional food practices. Chinese food culture is a perfect example.
ReplyDelete